Aid donor 1: So I thought we should meet to talk about how better to coordinate our [thing] distribution programme.
Aid donor 2: yes, thanks for the initiative, we’ve heard from the government that they would like us to rationalise our efforts – it’s a huge country but the way we’re working right now, most of the [things] are concentrated in 2 or 3 districts, and…
Aid donor 1: True, but those are also the districts where the highest number of people needing [things] live, and we’ve decided that they should be our [thing] focus districts for our programme going forward. At least for the next year.
Government: Can I…
Aid donor 2: OK, so we’re fine with that, we can just move out of your [thing] focus districts and go to other districts.
Aid donor 2’s number 2: Kind of, but our [thing] distributors are going to struggle with that because they’ve built up all their [thing] distribution networks in those districts, they’ve influenced [thing] consumption norms, they know they can hit their targets because there are high levels of [thing] demand there, they’ve…
Aid donor 1: OK so let’s have a transition plan so that you can hand over those districts…
Aid donor 1’s number 2: I’m not sure we want them to hand them over entirely…
Aid donor 1: Really?
Aid donor 1’s number 2: The thing is, in some of those districts we are promoting the [things], changing attitudes to [things], and building the capacity of [thing] distributors, but we aren’t actually funding the [things]. Aid donor 2 is paying for the [things].
Government: There’s also some work there by Aid donors 3 and 4, and in a couple of districts we are using government money to…
Aid donor 2: So will you take over the funding of the [things] in your districts, Aid donor 1?
Aid donor 1: Yes of course! Mostly. I mean, some of them – but we’re talking a LOT of [things]. We might need you to keep on paying for some of them. Quite a lot of them, even.
Government: What we would like is for each Aid donor to fund its own [things] in its own districts (they’re actually not really *your* districts because it’s not your country, but whatever…).
Aid donor 1: Yes, Government, absolutely, that’s what we want and what we will do. But it’s also important to be flexible.
Aid donor 2: So Aid donor 1, you are going to take over some of our [thing] consumers? Then you get all the people already consuming [things] and we have to build up our [thing] consumer numbers from scratch again.
Aid donor 1: Well actually they are our [thing] consumers already.
Aid donor 1’s number 2: Our definition of a [thing] consumer includes anyone who got a [thing] in our districts even if we didn’t actually pay for the [thing].
Government: If you add all of your [thing] consumers together, that’s well over a hundred thousand [thing] consumers – great impact!
Aid donor 2’s number 2: But you can’t add those numbers together. In some cases they’re the same [things]. They’re the same [thing] consumers. That would be double counting.
Aid donor 1: That’s our definition and that’s what we have to report. We want to know who our [thing] consumers are. They are ours. OURS.